Desper-D

That means that song was uploaded from his channel. Yes. It can be himself or someone who have access to his account. And uploading to the database is not equal to publishing to wider audience. Like Demodag, that are already uploaded but we still don't have access to this uploaded content. Correct. Label On The Table was given during uploading process from Gigi D'Agostino channel. That is correct. Correct. Wrong. Because ZYX also have rights to some of Gigi's songs, when Bortolotti sold them entire Media Recods catalogue. You misunderstand licensing information that is under the video. Those informations are given in order of importance. First is the main label. And you may see gigidagistino (on behalf of ZYX Music), but the first one is not gigidagistino but Zyx_Music_GmbH. Which means when Gigi was uploading song that was already published by Zyx he had to write ZYX as a label. And because of this, for example "L'Amour Toujours" was officially submitted by Gigi and ZYX into YT database then you can see both informations in licensing section, under the video. Gigi is obligated by law and agreement with YouTube to write right informations according to his best knowledge. The thing that the label is not yet registered it doesn't mean that process of registration is not pending. Also you said that Gigi may be only that can upload. But he is not. Every label company can upload Gigi's content that was bought by ZYX from Media Records if their agreement with ZYX allows it. That is why in the most popular Gigi's songs list of beholder of license is so long.

Please write those questions, if you can, because now I am confused. Maybe I didn't understand what you were written. Also my English is terrible.

Ok. Once again. Imagine you are an artist. You had a contract with one label that is rather popular. But after years this contract is over. But you still producing new tracks, but don't want to publish it, because you had bad experiences with your previous label and you don't want to sign contract with any labels at all. You want to be finally independent. And now you realize that is great opportunity to promote yourself and your music via YT, because YT now is not only amateur video platform but became one of the biggest players on streaming music market. So... You are creating official channel or you establish with YT that your channel from now will be the official one. Then you are creating label. Your own label, because you need it to because of legal reasons. Your label now is legal personality. It's important for business issues to establish it, because legal personality, even if it's not a human being, but rather a company, has its own rights and has a limitation of responsibility. Now you can split you as an artist from you as a businessman. So you are starting to post your unrealised tracks from your collection. Everytime you are doing you have to complete a survey that. And you need to write: main artist, label company, composer, lyricist and lot of additional information if not only you were involved in production of a track. Every time when you are published new track you have to do it. For literally every song. So... You were creating account DJ Maldestra, it's your public name. But because your name have a space between DJ and Maldestra, your username will be: djmaldestra. And when you were published your tracks you had to give a label names. Let's say Maldestra Records. And your unpublished now are registered and you can receive a money from royalties. But let's say that someone is bad guy. Let's name him Desper. And Desper is submitting your tracks on his channel too. But he is not an artist, so he didn't create artist channel on YT. This Desper cheater is posting your tracks on his amateur YT channel. But luckily you have an agreement with YT and their algorithms can protect you. In a moment when this bad Desper guy submitted your song into his channel YT informs him that this track is copyrighted. And if you did not forbid other channels to share or use your music in exchange of royalties, then after 24 to 48 hours after Desper published your song on his channel will appear information like this: Licenses: djmaldestra (on behalf of Maldestra Records)

It's not my statement that Gigi can upload anything on behalf of Zyx. It's wrong conclusion caused by misunderstanding of how this system works.

Yes. No. I will explain to you with a little history about things between: labels and artists; labels and YT; artists and YT. Everything starts when YouTube decided to give up with VEVO project and became streaming platform also for music. You see that time not all labels had agreement with Google about copyrights. So for example some artists had more than one channel to promote their own music. Some channels was created automatically like all VEVO channels and some was created personal by artists, omitting their own labels, who were still in conflict with Google/YouTube. Some years ago finally all major labels establish agreement with YouTube, about royalties, but YouTube situation was still in mess. How to govern so many channels created for every artists. So they decide to let them merge those channels under one main channel. In case of Gigi D'Agostino this main channel is: gigidagostino this name became official name in YT system. It's a name of channel that is submitting content. It's not a label! But artists still can create many labels, as they want. But they can't use names, in their labels, of companies that are already existed, because of legal issues Of course they don't have to submit tracks by themselves. For example Gigi was hirinig TuneCore at the beginning. But why pay for something that can be do by himself? So: "gigidagostino (on behalf of LABEL ON THE TABLE)" means that user gigidagostino submitted a video for the LABEL ON THE TABLE, the same user is also submitting videos for GIGI D'AGOSTINO PLANET. But this user can't send videos for ZYX Music, becuse ZYX has it's own managment (which by the way made a lot of mistakes) and Gigi is outside ZYX system. When I am talking about sending/submitting, I am talking about adding new song into YT copyright database! Because those videos can be published for the audience on many channels, like: TUTTODAG, GIGI DAG, LENTO VIOLENTO, GIGI NOISE MAKER etc.

This channel was made in Italy. But it doesn't proof anything. But one thing is strange, that Lentonova version of L'Amour Toujours was uploaded year before. But I need to listen carefully because it may be simple another Alan Walker style version of L'Amour Toujours.

Just asking. Not claiming. And it was not an argument in this discussion. In fact I asked it in different topic. Ok. You may right. Maybe he just carbon copied those tracks and upload it without paying them. Maybe he really just upload tracks that are so similar to the remixes made by other artist that YT algorithm simply recognize it as GFC Band versions. But whatever was submitted as GFC Band under Label On The Table was submitted by Gigi himself, because YT forbid to use the same name twice, and both Label To The Table and Gigi D'Agostino Planet are governed by Gigi's YT channel. That is the fact!

No one can upload anything as a gigidagistino - in YT licensing system, except Gigi D'Agostino who use the same account to upload all Gigi D'Agostino Planet releases. I am not talking about videos above. Two of them were submitted by myself. I am talking about songs/version of songs that was submitted into YT Copyright database. And this database is used to establish copyright and pay royalties to the respective authors. That's really not so complicated to understand.

Because for example old versions of L'Amour Toujours was in YT algorithm before. For sure was Johnny Vicious remix. And it was not recognize as a Danza, Trance or Hard Trance remix. But as a Johnny Vicious remix and main artist was Gigi D'Agostino. Also old copyrights holders are still there. All holders from american distributions are still mentioned. What changes is the main artist and name of remixes. And all those changes appear in the same moment when Label On The Table appears as a royalty holder. And it's first in the list! YouTube are giving informations in order of importance which means that first holder is the same who is submitted informations or for whom behalf companies are doing.

It's easy. Everyone knows that Gigi is using ghost producers, so why change something that is working perfectly? It's better to pay them in advance then to share royalties. But to be honest, this retroactivity it's for me odd. Buying rights for remixes that are not so successful and trying to change the past? It's something that I can only explain by a proud behavior, because it's nothing profitable. But I can be wrong. Music market is changing so fast, that maybe it's something visionary. Well, Gigi is a strange man living in a strange world of Gigi D'Agostino 😅

You are wrong. GDC Band name is submitted by Gigi D'Agostino himself. Not by any other beholder. Licence cleary states in order of importance that Label On The Table (similar name to Label To Fable) is govern personal by Gigi D'Agostino, like Gigi D'Agostino Planet. Why name of the label is different? I have no idea, but for sure both labels are governed by Gigi.

I guess Gigi started to buy copyrights from other producers. This GDC Band appears on at least on 4 different versions of "L'Amour Toujors" that wasn't for sure produced by Gigi D'Agostino. If you don't know what it means, follow the money, and everything became immediately clear.

Is it possible that is Gigi's hidden YT channel? https://www.youtube.com/@parabailarmas3219

I love this remix! Masterwork!!!

I guess Luca is a lover of chanson and France generally. This is genuine Tour De Dance style with reminiscences of Gigi's old style from 90's.

I think is time to remove double album from the name of topic, because it's not. If in the future Gigi and Luca will decide to release rest of songs, that Gigi claimed to be released as a second part of this release, then probably name of the album will be "Smoderanza 2".

I would like to remind that the name of the topic is still wrong 😉

I was not expecting anything good when I saw 20 songs. It's typical "sono libero" way of releasing songs. "Slowerland" is not my favorite series (except "Slowerland 2") so I was not expecting songs that I will like. However "Memoyage" and "La Mia Banda" was a really nice surprise. New version of "La Passion" is a joke. Bad taste joke. Not only the way how this song is produced, but also how long it is. It's like a releasing movie trailer and said to everyone to paid for a full movie. About Alan Walker style version of "L'Amour Toujours" I don't like only vocal version. I express my opinion about it on YT: The worst part are slowed and unsynchronised vocals. I know this vocals from other, older live version. This vocalisation is absolutely beautiful, but it's not slowed at all. Sounds natural, harmonic. Here it is sound terrible. I am not disappointed. I was expecting an average album and I received an average album. 🤷‍♂️

This track is beautiful, but as almost always, fading out at the end.

Artists are: LENTO VIOLENTO, GIGI D'AGOSTINO The title of album is: LENTO VIOLENTO DANCE (2001 - 2021) SLOWERLAND 3

Does anybody know who is singing in "Music"?

Yes 😃 😀

I also remember this 😅 If I am not wrong this "o ne ne" vocal sample is from "Ne" by Marc et Claude.