Rangliste

Endlich ist hier mal was los. 🍿

I guess Gigi started to buy copyrights from other producers. This GDC Band appears on at least on 4 different versions of "L'Amour Toujors" that wasn't for sure produced by Gigi D'Agostino. If you don't know what it means, follow the money, and everything became immediately clear.

Ok, so to summarize. When it says "gigidagostino (on behalf of LABEL ON THE TABLE)" this means that LABEL ON THE TABLE is a label owned by Gigi. And only Gigi can upload songs that contains "gigidagostino" in the license. That is to quote Desper "...the fact!" and "...really not so complicated to understand." So I can deduce and conclude, that since other songs has listed the following under licenses "gigidagostino (on behalf of ZYX Music)", that Gigi is the owner of ZYX.

Gigi D'Agostino Planet is Gigi's label. The company behind this label is Modusart SA and this company have exclusive rights for Gigi's music as mentioned here: https://www.moneyhouse.ch/de/company/modusart-sa-5212108461 There are only 4 trademarks registered by Mosudart: GIgi D'Agostino, Gigi Dag and Lento Violelnto https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/modusart-sa-4344837/ as artistas and Slowerland as mark https://www.swissreg.ch/srclient/faces/jsp/trademark/sr300.jsp?language=de&section=tm&id=09810%2F2020 There are no trademarks "GDC Band" and LABEL ON THE TABLE connected with Mosudart SA and therefore with Gigi. There is a way to use someone else samples in your own tracks - it's called "clear music rights". Anyone can contact music labels/musicians or special services to clear the music rights to use it in your own way. This may explain "gigidagostino (от лица компании "LABEL ON THE TABLE");" copyright. There's always a chance this all is really connected with Gigi and his goal is to get royalties from listenings of all the unofficial releases of his tracks on the YouTube and other platforms.

That I believe. I am sorry for my comments, but I hope you at least somewhat can understand my reaction, when presented with something that seems utterly ridiculous. And it seems ridiculous if you don't know that the passage "gigidagostino (på vegne af LABEL ON THE TABLE)" means that Gigi is actually responsible for the upload. (I doubt I am the only one who didn't know that). På vegne af = danish for on behalf of. By the way, when opening the first one for me there is no banner with automatically registered artist, track name and license. And the text... "Con licencia para YouTube de gigidagostino (en representación de LABEL ON THE TABLE); Warner Chappell, BMI - Broadcast Music Inc. y 9 sociedades de derechos musicales" ... is just manually inserted in the comments. At least when I open it. All of these practices seems incredible devious/malignant, and I find it difficult to keep up. But then what does it mean when under license some songs say "gigidagostino (on behalf of ZYX Music)". How can XYZ Music be governed by Gigi?

No one can upload anything as a gigidagistino - in YT licensing system, except Gigi D'Agostino who use the same account to upload all Gigi D'Agostino Planet releases. I am not talking about videos above. Two of them were submitted by myself. I am talking about songs/version of songs that was submitted into YT Copyright database. And this database is used to establish copyright and pay royalties to the respective authors. That's really not so complicated to understand.

Is it possible that is Gigi's hidden YT channel? https://www.youtube.com/@parabailarmas3219

https://krakenfiles.com/view/wscGCvphNl/file.html Hier ein Song den Federico Romanzi/Tamborder den er für mich produziert hat. Ich hoffe ja immer noch das er in der Zukunft nochmal für uns Fans Songs veröffentlicht. 😉

April April 😂

Wait, stop! "PARA BAILAR MAS" is one of Gigi's channels?! 🤯😵‍💫

I'll Fly With You / Sandstorm Bootleg is now "L'Amour Toujours ( Energy Long Mix )"

It's easy. Everyone knows that Gigi is using ghost producers, so why change something that is working perfectly? It's better to pay them in advance then to share royalties. But to be honest, this retroactivity it's for me odd. Buying rights for remixes that are not so successful and trying to change the past? It's something that I can only explain by a proud behavior, because it's nothing profitable. But I can be wrong. Music market is changing so fast, that maybe it's something visionary. Well, Gigi is a strange man living in a strange world of Gigi D'Agostino 😅

No you are wrong. Gigi is clearly an illusion created by me. I started making music in 1986 when I was -2 years old. I have written it on a german fan forum now, so it is obviously true, and my burden of proof is fulfilled.